Support Forum

Basically everything points to the SSD not being fast enough but it's showing very very low speeds like there's something wrong with it, the model is CT2000BX500SSD1 I've used it as my main OS SSD on windows for the last year or so and it behaved perfectly This is a QLC drive. Those are cheap and c...

Odd it would just stop working after it's work for years. What you are seeing is the result of several very large corporations (most notably google and microsoft) denying the use of well-established email standards, to force people deeper into their own software and cloud ecosystems. They're sellin...

When the usb stick is plugged-in and usable for sabnzbd, the output of the "mount" command in a terminal might just list all the info you need - including the options used to make it accessible for your user.

Your question is of a more general linux administration nature and not really sabnzbd specific. Usually, usb sticks that get automatically mounted when you plug them into a linux desktop session and don't have a native unix filesystem on them, are set up with permissions that allow full access for t...

That port number is a simple program setting that defaults to 8080 but may be set to something else in Config -> General. Keep it between 1024 and 65535 and make sure to restart the application afterwards.

Crucial P3 Plus NVMe SSD Note that drive uses QLC memory. While cheap, such drives are notoriously bad at sustained writes of large amounts of data (e.g. your typical download from Usenet). They'll start reasonably fast and can keep up appearances for long enough to fool casual benchmarks, but once...

I guess I could simply limit the sabnzbd bandwidth, but that does not seem like the correct solution. Anybody have any ideas what might cause this? Speed limiting is probably the only effective solution here. The bandwidth provided by your internet provider is so low by todayś standards that it tak...

Lustily4025 wrote: ↑June 20th, 2024, 11:31 am but it gave me an error when I saved it

Probably needs 'sudo' in front, the override file is stored somewhere in /etc iirc.

Direct edits to /lib/systemd/system/[email protected] will also work, but probably get overwritten whenever the sabnzbdplus package receives updates.

However, when I start it, it runs as user:user, which causes issues with folder permissions for other applications. I have edited etc/default/sabnzbdplus with USER=user:group and have verified that the user (my account) and group is listed on the system. The previous version I was running was 4.2.3...

If you updated from an official debian repository to 4.3.2, you must be using unstable (which is called that for a reason). Then again, that should also have the latest version of sabctools available; I uploaded both on Thursday: https://tracker.debian.org/news/1533673/ https://tracker.debian.org/ne...

Thanks for reporting this issue, this is actually a packaging bug; I'll upload a fixed version on the ppa shortly. The 4.3.2 release candidates need an explicit depedency on cheroot, since the application now imports that module directly to improve error handling. In practice the issue only affects ...

Five upgrades available (none of them are sabnzbdplus) [...] What am I missing? To check available packages, try apt policy sabnzbdplus Backports are pinned at a lower priority than the standard repos, to prevent your system from getting flooded when users typically only want a specific (subset of)...

The version in bullseye-backports is limited by Debian's backports policy that prevents it from going beyond what is packaged in bookworm, as that would interfere with the clean upgrade path when upgrading from bullseye to bookworm. If you want to stick with official packages but ignore that limit, ...

But why shouldn't I use the ppa? Because the PPA targets Ubuntu. The packages provided there - especially the architecture-dependent ones such as sabctools - are not binary compatible with Debian. The alternative in the backlog does only have version sabnzbdplus/bullseye-backports 3.7.1+dfsg-1~bpo1...

I always get the error, that GPG can't find a key for the repository, when I try to enable your ppa. [...] I'm on debian 11 (Bullseye). I don't really understand what i am supposed to do For starters, you probably don't want to use the PPA on debian. That said, with the gpg key you might be running...