Search found 12 matches
- August 12th, 2009, 1:23 pm
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: The queue is big and slow
- Replies: 5
- Views: 4853
Re: The queue is big and slow
I am not a fan of "Move Up" / "Move to the top" positioning as it removes the finer precision that is currently there on large queues. It is a hard one to get right really. Okay. But then, may I suggest not actually filling the options for the drop-down boxes, before they are ac...
- August 12th, 2009, 7:45 am
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: The queue is big and slow
- Replies: 5
- Views: 4853
Re: The queue is big and slow
0.5 has support for gzip compression, which should give you faster page loads. How would zipping each page, on localhost, make the browser's generation of the DOM any faster? I start to receive the page after 70 milliseconds, and the browser finishes rendering it after ~ 5 seconds. Wouldn't gzippin...
- August 11th, 2009, 11:07 am
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: The queue is big and slow
- Replies: 5
- Views: 4853
The queue is big and slow
With 150 entries, it takes 8 seconds to draw the table, because due to the design choice of giving the user the opportunity to move an entry to position X, and with having all options for entries filled in, 150 * 150 entries becomes 3 MiB. Without all the options, it's 150 KiB and takes 0.5 seconds ...
- August 7th, 2009, 12:48 pm
- Forum: Feature Requests
- Topic: delete multiple files in queue
- Replies: 6
- Views: 5020
Re: delete multiple files in queue
That's true; but delete is not the only action.
Say you can mark a number of entries, and then choose actions from a dropdown-box, such as "delete", "move to top", "move to bottom".
That'd be handy.
Say you can mark a number of entries, and then choose actions from a dropdown-box, such as "delete", "move to top", "move to bottom".
That'd be handy.
- July 30th, 2009, 1:43 pm
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: jQuery
- Replies: 1
- Views: 2185
jQuery
It's a bit of an improvement upon the old DOM-model, isn't it?
So especially, for the queue-view (and history), wouldn't it be an idea to consider using jQuery instead of the "refresh the entire page"-doctrine?
So especially, for the queue-view (and history), wouldn't it be an idea to consider using jQuery instead of the "refresh the entire page"-doctrine?
- July 29th, 2009, 2:45 pm
- Forum: Feature Requests
- Topic: delete multiple files in queue
- Replies: 6
- Views: 5020
Re: delete multiple files in queue
Agree.daniel_owen_uk wrote: I would say both, the ability to do select all, select none would be handy too.
The way newzbin does it, with range and invert, is pretty handy.
- May 10th, 2009, 2:44 am
- Forum: Feature Requests
- Topic: PRE-processing script
- Replies: 3
- Views: 3817
Re: PRE-processing script
Ok, so no reply so far. Maybe I threw too many ideas in there. Anyhow, looking at the 5.0 alpha 2, you've got: CREATE TABLE "history" ( "id" INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, "completed" INTEGER NOT NULL, "name" TEXT NOT NULL, "nzb_name" TEXT NOT ...
- April 25th, 2009, 7:44 am
- Forum: Post-Processing Scripts
- Topic: newzbin automated game downloader
- Replies: 5
- Views: 8492
Re: newzbin automated game downloader
Oh wow, I will definitiely look into this script.
I filed a Feature Request in relation to my idea for a similar script for music, here: http://forums.sabnzbd.org/index.php?topic=2019.0
I filed a Feature Request in relation to my idea for a similar script for music, here: http://forums.sabnzbd.org/index.php?topic=2019.0
- April 19th, 2009, 12:48 am
- Forum: Feature Requests
- Topic: PRE-processing script
- Replies: 3
- Views: 3817
PRE-processing script
With a preprocessing script, I could weed out both duplicate msgids from for example newzbin's RSS-feed for saved searches, and also previously downloaded msgids. To do this, I would need a database-backend, which I understand you will implement in 0.5.0 (sqlite3). I would use this primarily for dow...
- December 18th, 2008, 5:47 pm
- Forum: Feature Requests
- Topic: Don't download unnecessary pars
- Replies: 2
- Views: 2368
Re: Don't download unnecessary pars
Confirmed and closed.
- December 18th, 2008, 12:50 pm
- Forum: Feature Requests
- Topic: Don't download unnecessary pars
- Replies: 2
- Views: 2368
Don't download unnecessary pars
Often a set of files in a download are quite ok, and one only need to check the first, smallest par to determine this.
It would be cool if we could avoid downloading pars 2 through 9999999999999.
It would be cool if we could avoid downloading pars 2 through 9999999999999.
- December 18th, 2008, 12:48 pm
- Forum: Feature Requests
- Topic: Reorder files in a download
- Replies: 1
- Views: 2147
Reorder files in a download
Sometimes a newspost contains files where the download-parts are jumbled.
For example, part 10 comes after part 10000000000000000.
And it would be cool if we could download that before part 9999999999999999 without having to manually edit the nzb.
For example, part 10 comes after part 10000000000000000.
And it would be cool if we could download that before part 9999999999999999 without having to manually edit the nzb.