Search found 9 matches

by zsh
November 17th, 2009, 12:07 pm
Forum: General Discussion
Topic: Sabnzbd + SSL = CPU murder?
Replies: 16
Views: 15724

Re: Sabnzbd + SSL = CPU murder?

Ok here is the config: /etc/default/stunnel4 ENABLED=1 FILES="/etc/stunnel/*.conf" OPTIONS="" PPP_RESTART=0 /etc/init.d/stunnel4 Change only the following line: from: ENABLED=0 to: ENABLED=1 /etc/stunnel/stunnel.conf sslVersion = SSLv3 chroot = /var/lib/stunnel4/ setuid = stunnel...
by zsh
November 17th, 2009, 3:16 am
Forum: General Discussion
Topic: Sabnzbd + SSL = CPU murder?
Replies: 16
Views: 15724

Re: Sabnzbd + SSL = CPU murder?

With that config, it seems stunnel does not create a listening socket at all ... :-( Wait: I have SSL checked in SABnzbd. Is that correct? Or should SABnzbd use a plain NNTP connection, which stunnel then en-ssl-s? Hi, No SSL should not be enabled in Sabnzbd. I dont have access to my htpc atm, but ...
by zsh
November 16th, 2009, 4:07 pm
Forum: General Discussion
Topic: Sabnzbd + SSL = CPU murder?
Replies: 16
Views: 15724

Re: Sabnzbd + SSL = CPU murder?

Try running in client mode.

/etc/stunnel/stunnel.conf

comment out following (as shown):
;cert = /etc/stunnel/mail.pem
;key = /etc/stunnel/mail.pem

and make sure client mode is enabled as below:

; Use it for client mode
client = yes
by zsh
November 16th, 2009, 1:43 pm
Forum: General Discussion
Topic: Sabnzbd + SSL = CPU murder?
Replies: 16
Views: 15724

Re: Sabnzbd + SSL = CPU murder?

I tried the lazy methode below, but that does not work: SABnzbd reports a time-out / reset by peer 20 seconds after trying to connect over SSL to localhost on port 8888 Tips? Or is this just plain wrong? sander@quirinius:~$ sudo stunnel -d localhost:8888 -r sslreader.eweka.nl:563 sander@quirinius:~...
by zsh
November 16th, 2009, 11:52 am
Forum: General Discussion
Topic: Sabnzbd + SSL = CPU murder?
Replies: 16
Views: 15724

Re: Sabnzbd + SSL = CPU murder?

I'm surprised that stunnel delivers so much better performance. Unfortunately there's not much we can do to make SABnzbd better in this area because we have to rely on the standard SSL support for our programming language Python. (And we have no intention on re-writing such libraries). No idea to b...
by zsh
November 15th, 2009, 3:01 pm
Forum: General Discussion
Topic: Sabnzbd + SSL = CPU murder?
Replies: 16
Views: 15724

Re: Sabnzbd + SSL = CPU murder?

I am using stunnel now (which seems to be better optimized for this when it comes to resources). So, basically I'm running stunnel to my ssl usenet provider and sabnzbd server definition points to localhost (listening port) and no SSL. @zsh,  that is a great idea!  I don't know why I haven't though...
by zsh
November 15th, 2009, 8:21 am
Forum: General Discussion
Topic: Sabnzbd + SSL = CPU murder?
Replies: 16
Views: 15724

Re: Sabnzbd + SSL = CPU murder?

Thanks for reply inpheaux. I have created workarround concerning this "issue" :) I am using stunnel now (which seems to be better optimized for this when it comes to resources). So, basically I'm running stunnel to my ssl usenet provider and sabnzbd server definition points to localhost (l...
by zsh
November 14th, 2009, 12:52 pm
Forum: Beta Releases
Topic: Sign up to become an Official SABnzbd Tester (Temporarily Closed)
Replies: 274
Views: 247102

Re: Sign up to become an Official SABnzbd Tester

I would love to test new beta.
Using Sabnzbd on Windows as well as Linux (Asrock ION N330). Specially interested regarding SSL performance (improvements)

Cheers
by zsh
November 14th, 2009, 12:49 pm
Forum: General Discussion
Topic: Sabnzbd + SSL = CPU murder?
Replies: 16
Views: 15724

Sabnzbd + SSL = CPU murder?

Hi all, First of all, thanks for great application. Works like a charm. However, I do have a question regarding CPU usage and SSL. I know some other people have posted regarding this as well. My setup: Connection: 100mbit/s (verified pumping 95mbit +) Hardware: Asrock ION N330 1.6 ghz I use Astraweb...