Search found 7 matches
- February 3rd, 2010, 2:48 pm
- Forum: Bug Reports
- Topic: 0.5.0 RC3 - Linux Unrar version check error message confusing
- Replies: 14
- Views: 11929
Re: 0.5.0 RC3 - Linux Unrar version check error message confusing
ln -s /usr/local/bin/rar /usr/bin fixed it, but its strange that it wouldn't find it even tho my path was correct.
- February 3rd, 2010, 2:09 pm
- Forum: Bug Reports
- Topic: 0.5.0 RC3 - Linux Unrar version check error message confusing
- Replies: 14
- Views: 11929
Re: 0.5.0 RC3 - Linux Unrar version check error message confusing
little more info...
[beezel@julian ~]$ which rar
/usr/local/bin/rar
[beezel@julian ~]$ $PATH
-bash: /usr/lib64/qt-3.3/bin:/usr/kerberos/bin:/usr/lib64/ccache:/usr/local/bin:/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/sbin:/sbin:
and im starting sab as user beezel
[beezel@julian ~]$ which rar
/usr/local/bin/rar
[beezel@julian ~]$ $PATH
-bash: /usr/lib64/qt-3.3/bin:/usr/kerberos/bin:/usr/lib64/ccache:/usr/local/bin:/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/sbin:/sbin:
and im starting sab as user beezel
- February 3rd, 2010, 1:38 pm
- Forum: Bug Reports
- Topic: 0.5.0 RC3 - Linux Unrar version check error message confusing
- Replies: 14
- Views: 11929
Re: 0.5.0 RC3 - Linux Unrar version check error message confusing
shy, thanks for the quick reply. i removed unrar via yum and installed the x64 from rarlabs.com, but now sab isn't seeing rar at all. i checked sabnzbd.ini but couldn't find a place to specify where rar is located. im seeing: unrar binary... NOT found tho a simple rar or unrar yeilds: unrar UNRAR 3...
- February 3rd, 2010, 4:49 am
- Forum: Bug Reports
- Topic: 0.5.0 RC3 - Linux Unrar version check error message confusing
- Replies: 14
- Views: 11929
Re: 0.5.0 RC3 - Linux Unrar version check error message confusing
I'm on fc10, and unfortunately it looks like ive been abandoned a while back version-wise: Installed Packages unrar.x86_64 3.7.8-3.fc10 installed Available Packages unrar.x86_64 3.7.8-3.fc10 rpmfusion-nonfree is there any reason...
- December 12th, 2009, 5:42 pm
- Forum: Beta Releases
- Topic: sabnzbd+ 0.5.0beta1 and expat-2.0.1-8 for Fedora 12 are incompatible
- Replies: 8
- Views: 4288
Re: sabnzbd+ 0.5.0beta1 and expat-2.0.1-8 for Fedora 12 are incompatible
ok, so rpm -e --nodeps killed yum, so i had to wget expat-2.0.1-5 from a repo and install it via rpm -ihv instead. easy fix, after blacklisting expat from yum.
- December 12th, 2009, 1:01 am
- Forum: Beta Releases
- Topic: sabnzbd+ 0.5.0beta1 and expat-2.0.1-8 for Fedora 12 are incompatible
- Replies: 8
- Views: 4288
Re: sabnzbd+ 0.5.0beta1 and expat-2.0.1-8 for Fedora 12 are incompatible
im thinking:
rpm -e -nodeps expat-2.0.1-8.fc10.x86_64
rpm -e -nodeps expat-devel-2.0.1-8.fc10.x86_64
yum --allow-downgrade install expat*-5.fc10.x86_64
does this sound appropriate? just trying not to hose my box and end up working all weekend
rpm -e -nodeps expat-2.0.1-8.fc10.x86_64
rpm -e -nodeps expat-devel-2.0.1-8.fc10.x86_64
yum --allow-downgrade install expat*-5.fc10.x86_64
does this sound appropriate? just trying not to hose my box and end up working all weekend
- December 12th, 2009, 12:47 am
- Forum: Beta Releases
- Topic: sabnzbd+ 0.5.0beta1 and expat-2.0.1-8 for Fedora 12 are incompatible
- Replies: 8
- Views: 4288
Re: sabnzbd+ 0.5.0beta1 and expat-2.0.1-8 for Fedora 12 are incompatible
Today I upgraded from expat-2.0.1-7 to expat-2.0.1-8 and found sabnzbd+ 0.5.0beta1 stopped taking nzbs with the error message below. To fix it I downgraded back to expat-2.0.1-7. Then sabnzbd+ started working again. expat-2.0.1-8 seems to be a security release. Below is the changelog. Error mes...