Seems that if a job contains more than 200 rar files, SAB displays the unpacking procedure wrongly.
(Minor): Wrong display if job contains >200 rar files
Forum rules
Help us help you:
Help us help you:
- Are you using the latest stable version of SABnzbd? Downloads page.
- Tell us what system you run SABnzbd on.
- Adhere to the forum rules.
- Do you experience problems during downloading?
Check your connection in Status and Interface settings window.
Use Test Server in Config > Servers.
We will probably ask you to do a test using only basic settings. - Do you experience problems during repair or unpacking?
Enable +Debug logging in the Status and Interface settings window and share the relevant parts of the log here using [ code ] sections.
Re: (Minor): Wrong display if job contains >200 rar files
Probably because unrar sends incorrect info.
Does it work correctly otherwise?
Does it work correctly otherwise?
Re: (Minor): Wrong display if job contains >200 rar files
yes, works fine otherwise.
I use Debian wheezy non-free unrar:
Package: unrar
New: yes
State: installed
Automatically installed: no
Version: 1:4.0.3-1
Priority: optional
Section: non-free/utils
Maintainer: Martin Meredith <[email protected]>
Uncompressed Size: 254 k
Depends: libc6 (>= 2.2.5), libgcc1 (>= 1:4.1.1), libstdc++6 (>= 4.1.1)
Conflicts: rar (<= 2.60-1)
Description: Unarchiver for .rar files (non-free version)
Unrar can extract files from .rar archives. If you want to create .rar archives, install package rar.
Homepage: http://www.rarlabs.com/
I use Debian wheezy non-free unrar:
Package: unrar
New: yes
State: installed
Automatically installed: no
Version: 1:4.0.3-1
Priority: optional
Section: non-free/utils
Maintainer: Martin Meredith <[email protected]>
Uncompressed Size: 254 k
Depends: libc6 (>= 2.2.5), libgcc1 (>= 1:4.1.1), libstdc++6 (>= 4.1.1)
Conflicts: rar (<= 2.60-1)
Description: Unarchiver for .rar files (non-free version)
Unrar can extract files from .rar archives. If you want to create .rar archives, install package rar.
Homepage: http://www.rarlabs.com/
Re: (Minor): Wrong display if job contains >200 rar files
I wasn't doubting your specific unrar version, but unrar in general.
To make my life easier, can you email an example NZB that shows this behaviour?
Email to bugs at sabnzbd.org and add the URL of this thread.
To make my life easier, can you email an example NZB that shows this behaviour?
Email to bugs at sabnzbd.org and add the URL of this thread.
Re: (Minor): Wrong display if job contains >200 rar files
I've sent the NZB that caused this issue
Re: (Minor): Wrong display if job contains >200 rar files
This post was created with old-style RAR segments. r01..r99 up to t01..t51.
Few posters use that any more.
New style numbering, like *.part001.* to *.part300.* will show proper numbering.
I consider this a low priority issue.
Few posters use that any more.
New style numbering, like *.part001.* to *.part300.* will show proper numbering.
I consider this a low priority issue.
Re: (Minor): Wrong display if job contains >200 rar files
absolutely It's purely cosmetic