[Multipar] Option?

Questions and bug reports for Beta releases should be posted here.
Forum rules
Help us help you:
  • Tell us what system you run SABnzbd on.
  • Adhere to the forum rules.
  • Do you experience problems during downloading?
    Check your connection in Status and Interface settings window.
    Use Test Server in Config > Servers.
    We will probably ask you to do a test using only basic settings.
  • Do you experience problems during repair or unpacking?
    Enable +Debug logging in the Status and Interface settings window and share the relevant parts of the log here using [ code ] sections.
joao

[Multipar] Option?

Post by joao »

Dev,

is it possible to start working with multipar? I installed multipar a while ago ans came to the conclusion that it repairs alot quicker than par2.exe
Maybe an option for the beta 3 version of SABnzbd?

Keep up the good work!
User avatar
inpheaux
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 563
Joined: January 16th, 2008, 9:14 pm

Re: [Multipar] Option?

Post by inpheaux »

No clue!

Would you like to do some benchmarking for us?

Edit: Major requirement for SABnzbd is that we must have a CLI option.
joao

Re: [Multipar] Option?

Post by joao »

inpheaux wrote: No clue!

Would you like to do some benchmarking for us?

Edit: Major requirement for SABnzbd is that we must have a CLI option.
CLI options:

Code: Select all

Usage
c(reate) [f,fu,r,n,p,m,c,d,in,u] <par file> [input files]
v(erify) [  d,i,u,b] <par file>
r(epair) [m,d,i,u,b] <par file>
l(ist)   [u,h] <par file>

Option
 /f    : Use file-list instead of files
 /fu   : Use file-list which is encoded with UTF-8
 /r<n> : Rate of redundancy (%)
 /n<n> : Number of parity volumes
 /p<n> : First parity volume number
 /m<n> : Memory usage
 /c"*" : Set comment
 /d"*" : Set directory of input files
 /i    : Recreate index file
 /in   : Do not create index file
 /u    : Console output is encoded with UTF-8
 /b    : Backup existing files before repair
 /h    : List hash value of input files
Benchmark is on the way
premiso
Release Testers
Release Testers
Posts: 16
Joined: June 28th, 2010, 11:43 am

Re: [Multipar] Option?

Post by premiso »

[Removed due to innaccuracy]

So the executables included in the archive are not just par2 :) I thought that they just referenced that.
Last edited by premiso on February 28th, 2011, 9:49 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
john3voltas
Release Testers
Release Testers
Posts: 115
Joined: January 17th, 2008, 5:35 pm
Location: Lisbon/Portugal

Re: [Multipar] Option?

Post by john3voltas »

Hi Joao.
I'm not sure which multipar you are referring to.
Could you leave a link to it's website?
I'm curious if it's a only-windows tool or if it's also available for *nix.
Cheers
SABnzbd 0.6.0Alpha11 on Fedora 14-64bit laptop.
Usenet-News, TeraNews, newszilla6.xs4all.nl and reader.ipv6.xsnews.nl.
IPv6 connections powered by Hurricane Electric.
Can pull 30Mbit nntp on a 30Mbit FTTH link.
joao

Re: [Multipar] Option?

Post by joao »

john3voltas wrote: Hi Joao.
I'm not sure which multipar you are referring to.
Could you leave a link to it's website?
I'm curious if it's a only-windows tool or if it's also available for *nix.
Cheers
Hi,

i uploaded @ http://www.megaupload.com/?d=FZFJV3GZ
Rezzar
Newbie
Newbie
Posts: 2
Joined: March 1st, 2011, 10:18 am

Re: [Multipar] Option?

Post by Rezzar »

This is the Website for Multipar

http://hp.vector.co.jp/authors/VA021385/

And here's some description  ::)  http://www.livebusinesschat.com/smf/ind ... pic=1994.0

Regards,
Rezz
Last edited by Rezzar on March 1st, 2011, 10:27 am, edited 1 time in total.
mck
Newbie
Newbie
Posts: 14
Joined: August 28th, 2008, 7:44 am

Re: [Multipar] Option?

Post by mck »

bump
any chance this is going to happen?
Because multipar is much more reliable and faster than par2cmdline even when using it via wine.
User avatar
shypike
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 19774
Joined: January 18th, 2008, 12:49 pm

Re: [Multipar] Option?

Post by shypike »

mck wrote:Because multipar is much more reliable and faster than par2cmdline even when using it via wine.
The speed might be true, but do you have anything to backup your reliability claim?
The Windows and OSX distributions already have alternative par2 programs.
By my experience the classic par2cmdline is the most reliable one, but also the slowest.
smidley
Jr. Member
Jr. Member
Posts: 64
Joined: January 29th, 2010, 11:34 pm

Re: [Multipar] Option?

Post by smidley »

User avatar
eXisTa
Release Testers
Release Testers
Posts: 20
Joined: July 3rd, 2009, 3:07 am
Contact:

Re: [Multipar] Option?

Post by eXisTa »

Please replace par2 with multipar so we can use par3 files.
In the past two weeks I downloaded multiple files wich had *.pa3 files.
Only with multi-par I was able to use them.
User avatar
sander
Release Testers
Release Testers
Posts: 9061
Joined: January 22nd, 2008, 2:22 pm

Re: [Multipar] Option?

Post by sander »

eXisTa wrote:Please replace par2 with multipar so we can use par3 files.
In the past two weeks I downloaded multiple files wich had *.pa3 files.
Only with multi-par I was able to use them.
I found a poster "ikbenhetmaar" with a lot of pa3 posts: DVD's with the usual rar files, and then pa3 files (instead of par files).

I created an NZB, and downloaded it without problems: apparently all rars were available.

So I edited the .NZB file and removed a few lines from the .rar parts. Downloading that NZB resulted in "Unpacking failed, CRC error", and no rar or pa3 files; just an attempt by SAB to create the real files. Strange. Or is my method wrong? EDIT: Oh, I found some stuff in 'tempie'... TBC

I will now only download the crippled NZB and see if I can manually repair it. If so, maybe a pa3-postprocessing script would be a workaround for the time being?
User avatar
shypike
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 19774
Joined: January 18th, 2008, 12:49 pm

Re: [Multipar] Option?

Post by shypike »

People uploading with par3 files are fools.
Multipar is Windows-only.
I'm not sure it's a good idea to start supporting non-standard methods.
User avatar
eXisTa
Release Testers
Release Testers
Posts: 20
Joined: July 3rd, 2009, 3:07 am
Contact:

Re: [Multipar] Option?

Post by eXisTa »

shypike wrote:People uploading with par3 files are fools.
Multipar is Windows-only.
I'm not sure it's a good idea to start supporting non-standard methods.
I couldn't agree more with that, maybe there could be a mechanism in wich SAB ignores par3-files or cancels the download?
User avatar
sander
Release Testers
Release Testers
Posts: 9061
Joined: January 22nd, 2008, 2:22 pm

Re: [Multipar] Option?

Post by sander »

shypike wrote:People uploading with par3 files are fools. Multipar is Windows-only.
Cool ... with more and more developers on OSX and Linux, more and more software is available for OSX and Linux. And not because a certain sales or product manager has decided so, but just because of the developers that want to develop on their own platform and use their own products.
Post Reply