I will support this feature request.
I have a 40Mbit line on Giganews and rarely have to repair files.
My download server is a Synology NAS (CPU not the fastest). This results in the fact that a 4GB movie takes at least twice as long to parity check as it does to download.
So ... these scenerios would be perfect for me.
1) no errors: UNRAR
2) errors: UNRAR (fail) -> PAR2 repair -> UNRAR (succeed)
Couldn't this be implemented in a post processing script?
RAR > PAR > RAR first
Re: RAR > PAR > RAR first
What do you think - should I go for the trunk - or Alpha5?
And on a scale from 1 to 10 - how stable is it? :-)
And on a scale from 1 to 10 - how stable is it? :-)