Currently on version 0.7.6 on Windows 7 x64
For some reason I seem to be getting some nzbs that are just failing. From the download screen the status is just "failed".
When I go to the files that are left on the system they always work when I got to unrar them. No need to fix them at all, just right click and extract to directory and they come out great.
Here is a link to the logs. Hopefully someone has some insight into why they might be failing.
Is there another log that I should be looking at? Is there a way to turn on more verbose logging?
If you look towards the end there is two 2 broke girls from 12/11, Mentalist from 12/9 and Nikita from 12/7
Here are my Post Processing settings
Thanks for the help
Josh
Problem with some nzbs having errors for no reason
Forum rules
Help us help you:
Help us help you:
- Are you using the latest stable version of SABnzbd? Downloads page.
- Tell us what system you run SABnzbd on.
- Adhere to the forum rules.
- Do you experience problems during downloading?
Check your connection in Status and Interface settings window.
Use Test Server in Config > Servers.
We will probably ask you to do a test using only basic settings. - Do you experience problems during repair or unpacking?
Enable +Debug logging in the Status and Interface settings window and share the relevant parts of the log here using [ code ] sections.
Problem with some nzbs having errors for no reason
Last edited by JoshFink on December 14th, 2012, 3:49 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Problem with some nzbs having errors for no reason
First hypothesis: a post-processing script (SB?) that returns a fail-value. So: test without any post-processing script.
Re: Problem with some nzbs having errors for no reason
Interesting idea. They all use the exact same post processing though.
Re: Problem with some nzbs having errors for no reason
Oh wait: do you mean the "[newsunpack:823] Par verify failed on" ?
If so:
Don't you see "Par verify failed" in the SAB GUI?
What if you turn off MultiCore Par2? And remove the extra parameter?
Can you run a manual par / par2 verify on the file and see what happens?
If so:
Don't you see "Par verify failed" in the SAB GUI?
What if you turn off MultiCore Par2? And remove the extra parameter?
Can you run a manual par / par2 verify on the file and see what happens?
Re: Problem with some nzbs having errors for no reason
I don't see anything about Par Verify Failed in the GUi.
Am I missing something?
I could try turning off multicore par2 but I have reservations about it. 90% of things work, it's just these few every week that error out. What would make most of them work and some not? As far as I can see there are no errors with the files when unrarred manually. They are misnamed though. I've noticed that if I do run them through quickpar it renames them but should I be able to do the same thing within SAB?
Am I missing something?
I could try turning off multicore par2 but I have reservations about it. 90% of things work, it's just these few every week that error out. What would make most of them work and some not? As far as I can see there are no errors with the files when unrarred manually. They are misnamed though. I've noticed that if I do run them through quickpar it renames them but should I be able to do the same thing within SAB?
Last edited by JoshFink on December 14th, 2012, 3:49 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Problem with some nzbs having errors for no reason
Set logging to Debug on the Status page.
Then after such a failure look at the end of the log file for more clues.
(Log file also available from the Status page.)
Then after such a failure look at the end of the log file for more clues.
(Log file also available from the Status page.)
Re: Problem with some nzbs having errors for no reason
Thanks.. I'll look at that
Re: Problem with some nzbs having errors for no reason
sander wrote:Oh wait: do you mean the "[newsunpack:823] Par verify failed on" ?
If so:
Don't you see "Par verify failed" in the SAB GUI?
What if you turn off MultiCore Par2? And remove the extra parameter?
Can you run a manual par / par2 verify on the file and see what happens?
I won't doubt you again. It looks like it was erroring out with the -t1 , I changed it to -t+ and no errors. We'll see how it goes.
Thank You