[1.1.0b1] 2x jquery in glitter?

Questions and bug reports for Beta releases should be posted here.
Forum rules
Help us help you:
  • Tell us what system you run SABnzbd on.
  • Adhere to the forum rules.
  • Do you experience problems during downloading?
    Check your connection in Status and Interface settings window.
    Use Test Server in Config > Servers.
    We will probably ask you to do a test using only basic settings.
  • Do you experience problems during repair or unpacking?
    Enable +Debug logging in the Status and Interface settings window and share the relevant parts of the log here using [ code ] sections.
Post Reply
User avatar
jcfp
Release Testers
Release Testers
Posts: 1004
Joined: February 7th, 2008, 12:45 pm

[1.1.0b1] 2x jquery in glitter?

Post by jcfp »

I noticed the ...-src.tar.gz carries two different versions of jquery in interfaces/Glitter/templates/static/javascripts/: jquery-1.11.2.min.js and jquery.min.js (which holds v. 2.2.2).

Is this intentional? Some requirement in terms of jquery versions needed for glitter to function?
User avatar
safihre
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 5524
Joined: April 30th, 2015, 7:35 am
Contact:

Re: [1.1.0b1] 2x jquery in glitter?

Post by safihre »

That should not be there. It's also not there in the Github repo (https://github.com/sabnzbd/sabnzbd/tree ... avascripts)
The 1.11.2 is for the config and should only be in: interfaces\Config\templates\staticcfg\js
But somehow it ended up there in the tar.gz I see..
Maybe old file-structure @shypike? :D
If you like our support, check our special newsserver deal or donate at: https://sabnzbd.org/donate
User avatar
shypike
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 19774
Joined: January 18th, 2008, 12:49 pm

Re: [1.1.0b1] 2x jquery in glitter?

Post by shypike »

Accident, failure to clean up build folder.
I've uploaded a new gz, called SABnzbd-1.1.0Beta1a-src.tar.gz
User avatar
jcfp
Release Testers
Release Testers
Posts: 1004
Joined: February 7th, 2008, 12:45 pm

Re: [1.1.0b1] 2x jquery in glitter?

Post by jcfp »

Image
Post Reply