Page 1 of 1
Checking stuck at 99%
Posted: June 28th, 2017, 12:20 pm
by semel
It started happening after I upgraded to the latest version.
Afaik there was a similar bug a long time ago but I thought it was fixed..
Re: Checking stuck at 99%
Posted: June 28th, 2017, 2:44 pm
by safihre
Which version of Sabnzbd is this?
How many servers do you have with which priorities?
Do you have Check before download turned on?
Does it continue when you pause and unpause the individual download?
Re: Checking stuck at 99%
Posted: June 28th, 2017, 2:48 pm
by semel
1)2.2.0 Alpha 2
2) one server
3) Yes, obviously
4) When I pause-unpause the individual download that got stuck at 99% sab finishes checking and starts downloading
PS Hmm.. and now it seems to be working fine... Maybe I got mistaken..maybe it was Alpha 1 that didn't work. Sorry
I'll keep an eye on checking and and if it starts getting stuck at 99% I'll post here
Re: Checking stuck at 99%
Posted: June 28th, 2017, 3:05 pm
by safihre
Oh yes the topic title says checking
But indeed I changed something in the code in ge hope to improve things, clearly I didn't.. Hmm.
Have to look at this again, but in the mean time I can only suggest to downgrade to older version or disable pre check.
Re: Checking stuck at 99%
Posted: June 28th, 2017, 4:18 pm
by semel
It seems I was too optimistic
It got stuck again. This time at 100%
I'll disable it for now.
Re: Checking stuck at 99%
Posted: June 29th, 2017, 2:17 am
by safihre
So it can look to be suck at 100% because the par2 are not counted in the 100% but still checked. So it basically goes to 110%.
Can you see if thats it maybe? You can see it in the job details (folder icon if you hover over the job) if all files are 100% done.
Re: Checking stuck at 99%
Posted: June 29th, 2017, 10:12 am
by semel
I don't remember what it was I was trying to check ;(
Anyways, I tried different nbz and they worked fine, then I found several others that got stuck at 99% and then I tried to check them again and the second time they got checked just fine. The problem is I can't seem to reproduce this.